Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
94 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-140mm (F2.7-5.6) lens
- 165g - 97 x 58 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Canon A3100 IS versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the A3100 IS (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is pretty close but the A3100 IS (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") use different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe A3100 IS was brought out 3 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the A3100 IS scores vs the XZ-2 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A3100 IS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon A3100 IS Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3100 IS over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| A3100 IS | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Canon A3100 IS
| XZ-2 iHS | A3100 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 35 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon A3100 IS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| A3100 IS | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon A3100 IS has physical measurements of 97mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon A3100 IS versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the A3100 IS compared to the XZ-2 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the A3100 IS and XZ-2 iHS is 94 and 85 respectively.
Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements just by looking through technical specs. The photograph underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the A3100 IS and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have got the exact same resolution albeit different sensor measurements. The A3100 IS offers the smaller sensor which will make obtaining shallow DOF harder. The older A3100 IS will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3100 IS | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A3100 IS | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-01-05 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-140mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.7-5.6 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 165 grams (0.36 lbs) | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 58 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-8L | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HD MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $159 | $450 |
