Canon A3200 IS vs Fujifilm F800EXR
95 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34


90 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Canon A3200 IS vs Fujifilm F800EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 149g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Launched July 2012
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm F770EXR
- Refreshed by Fujifilm F900EXR

Canon A3200 IS vs Fujifilm F800EXR Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Canon A3200 IS versus Fujifilm F800EXR, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Canon and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the A3200 IS (14MP) and the Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) is fairly comparable but the A3200 IS (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") have different sensor size.

The A3200 IS was revealed 18 months before the Fujifilm F800EXR making them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short view of how the A3200 IS matches up vs the Fujifilm F800EXR for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Canon A3200 IS vs Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A3200 IS & Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR. The full galleries are provided at Canon A3200 IS Gallery & Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3200 IS over the Fujifilm F800EXR
A3200 IS | Fujifilm F800EXR |
---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Canon A3200 IS
Fujifilm F800EXR | A3200 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 18 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A3200 IS and Fujifilm F800EXR
A3200 IS | Fujifilm F800EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Canon A3200 IS vs Fujifilm F800EXR Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon A3200 IS comes with outer measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Fujifilm F800EXR has measurements of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check the Canon A3200 IS versus Fujifilm F800EXR in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the A3200 IS and the Fujifilm F800EXR.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A3200 IS and Fujifilm F800EXR is 95 and 90 respectively.

Canon A3200 IS vs Fujifilm F800EXR Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements merely by seeing specs. The graphic here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the A3200 IS and Fujifilm F800EXR.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The A3200 IS using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Fujifilm F800EXR will provide more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The older A3200 IS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Canon A3200 IS vs Fujifilm F800EXR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A3200 IS vs Fujifilm F800EXR Specifications
Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model type | Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2012-07-25 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | EXR |
Sensor type | CCD | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Smart | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 149 gr (0.33 lbs) | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 41 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.9 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 143 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-8L | NP-50A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $230 | $330 |