Canon A3200 IS vs Kodak C135
95 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
Canon A3200 IS vs Kodak C135 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 149g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Canon A3200 IS vs Kodak C135 Overview
Following is a detailed assessment of the Canon A3200 IS vs Kodak C135, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the A3200 IS (14MP) and the C135 (14MP) is relatively close and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe A3200 IS was announced 12 months earlier than the C135 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a simple view of how the A3200 IS scores against the C135 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon A3200 IS vs Kodak C135 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot A3200 IS & Kodak EasyShare C135. The whole galleries are available at Canon A3200 IS Gallery & Kodak C135 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3200 IS over the Kodak C135
| A3200 IS | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 112k | Crisper screen (+118k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Canon A3200 IS
| C135 | A3200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 12 months |
Common features in the Canon A3200 IS and Kodak C135
| A3200 IS | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Canon A3200 IS vs Kodak C135 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Canon A3200 IS has physical measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Kodak C135 has specifications of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Canon A3200 IS vs Kodak C135 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the A3200 IS and the C135.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the A3200 IS and C135 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Canon A3200 IS vs Kodak C135 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by researching specs. The picture underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the A3200 IS and C135.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of images but you need to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged A3200 IS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon A3200 IS vs Kodak C135 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon A3200 IS vs Kodak C135 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Kodak EasyShare C135 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Kodak |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Kodak EasyShare C135 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1250 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.4 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 112 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Smart | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 149g (0.33 lb) | 175g (0.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-8L | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $230 | $0 |