Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
95 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 149g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Canon A3200 IS versus Olympus TG-1 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the A3200 IS (14MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe A3200 IS was announced 16 months prior to the TG-1 iHS which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the A3200 IS matches up vs the TG-1 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A3200 IS and Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Canon A3200 IS Gallery and Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3200 IS over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| A3200 IS | TG-1 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Canon A3200 IS
| TG-1 iHS | A3200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2012 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 16 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A3200 IS and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| A3200 IS | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon A3200 IS has outer dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Olympus TG-1 iHS has dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Canon A3200 IS versus Olympus TG-1 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the A3200 IS versus the TG-1 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the A3200 IS and TG-1 iHS is 95 and 91 respectively.
Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizing purely by viewing specs. The photograph here may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the A3200 IS and TG-1 iHS.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Canon A3200 IS to render more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older A3200 IS will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2012-05-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Smart | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 149g (0.33 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-8L | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $230 | $399 |