Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus VR-320
95 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
94 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 149g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus VR-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the A3200 IS (14MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe A3200 IS was brought out 6 months prior to the VR-320 and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the A3200 IS matches up against the VR-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot A3200 IS & Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are available at Canon A3200 IS Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3200 IS over the Olympus VR-320
| A3200 IS | VR-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Canon A3200 IS
| VR-320 | A3200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Canon A3200 IS and Olympus VR-320
| A3200 IS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 | July 2011 | Similar age | |
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon A3200 IS provides physical measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the A3200 IS vs the VR-320.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the A3200 IS and VR-320 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions purely by going over technical specs. The picture here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the A3200 IS and VR-320.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution and you can expect similar quality of files however you will need to consider the launch date of the products into consideration.
Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Olympus VR-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Smart | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 149 gr (0.33 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-8L | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $230 | $179 |