Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus XZ-1
95 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 149g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Canon A3200 IS and Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Canon and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the A3200 IS (14MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the A3200 IS (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") offer different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe A3200 IS was unveiled within a month of the XZ-1 and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the A3200 IS grades against the XZ-1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A3200 IS & Olympus XZ-1. The full galleries are provided at Canon A3200 IS Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3200 IS over the Olympus XZ-1
| A3200 IS | XZ-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Canon A3200 IS
| XZ-1 | A3200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A3200 IS and Olympus XZ-1
| A3200 IS | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | January 2011 | Same age | |
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Canon A3200 IS provides external dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
See the Canon A3200 IS and Olympus XZ-1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the A3200 IS compared to the XZ-1.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the A3200 IS and XZ-1 is 95 and 88 respectively.
Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specs. The image underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the A3200 IS and XZ-1.
All in all, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The A3200 IS having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Canon A3200 IS will provide more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics way more aggressively.
Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2011-01-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Smart | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 149 grams (0.33 lbs) | 275 grams (0.61 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-8L | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $230 | $567 |