Canon A3200 IS vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
95 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
91 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
Canon A3200 IS vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 149g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon A3200 IS vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Canon A3200 IS versus Pentax WG-2 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the A3200 IS (14MP) and the WG-2 GPS (16MP) is very close and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe A3200 IS was launched 13 months earlier than the WG-2 GPS making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summary of how the A3200 IS scores versus the WG-2 GPS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Canon A3200 IS vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot A3200 IS & Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS. The complete galleries are provided at Canon A3200 IS Gallery & Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3200 IS over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
| A3200 IS | WG-2 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Canon A3200 IS
| WG-2 GPS | A3200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 13 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A3200 IS and Pentax WG-2 GPS
| A3200 IS | WG-2 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Canon A3200 IS vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Canon A3200 IS features physical dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Pentax WG-2 GPS has specifications of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Check the Canon A3200 IS versus Pentax WG-2 GPS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the A3200 IS versus the WG-2 GPS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A3200 IS and WG-2 GPS is 95 and 91 respectively.
Canon A3200 IS vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to see the gap in sensor sizes just by looking through specifications. The pic here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the A3200 IS and WG-2 GPS.
Plainly, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Pentax WG-2 GPS to render extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged A3200 IS will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Canon A3200 IS vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon A3200 IS vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Pentax |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2012-02-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Smart | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 149 grams (0.33 lbs) | 198 grams (0.44 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-8L | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $230 | $300 |