Canon A3200 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
95 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Canon A3200 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 149g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon A3200 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Canon A3200 IS versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Ricoh. The resolution of the A3200 IS (14MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe A3200 IS was released 4 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the A3200 IS grades against the WG-4 GPS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon A3200 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A3200 IS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are provided at Canon A3200 IS Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3200 IS over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| A3200 IS | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Canon A3200 IS
| WG-4 GPS | A3200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 37 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A3200 IS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| A3200 IS | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Canon A3200 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Canon A3200 IS enjoys external dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Compare the Canon A3200 IS versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the A3200 IS against the WG-4 GPS.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A3200 IS and WG-4 GPS is 95 and 90 respectively.
Canon A3200 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing technical specs. The photograph below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the A3200 IS and WG-4 GPS.
As you can tell, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older A3200 IS will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Canon A3200 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon A3200 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Smart | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 149 grams (0.33 pounds) | 235 grams (0.52 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-8L | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $230 | $210 |