Canon A3300 IS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1
95 Imaging
38 Features
30 Overall
34
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Canon A3300 IS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 149g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon A3300 IS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Overview
Below is a complete overview of the Canon A3300 IS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Canon and FujiFilm. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the A3300 IS (16MP) and Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) but they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe A3300 IS was launched 18 months later than the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick overview of how the A3300 IS scores versus the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon A3300 IS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot A3300 IS and Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon A3300 IS Gallery and Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3300 IS over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| A3300 IS | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 | July 2009 | More recent by 18 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Canon A3300 IS
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | A3300 IS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon A3300 IS and Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| A3300 IS | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Canon A3300 IS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Canon A3300 IS provides physical dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 has specifications of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs).
Contrast the Canon A3300 IS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the A3300 IS and the Fujifilm Real 3D W1.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A3300 IS and Fujifilm Real 3D W1 is 95 and 90 respectively.
Canon A3300 IS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out specs. The photograph below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the A3300 IS and Fujifilm Real 3D W1.
All in all, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should count on the Canon A3300 IS to produce more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent A3300 IS should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Canon A3300 IS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon A3300 IS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3300 IS | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A3300 IS | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | RP (Real Photo) 3D |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 8cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.8 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 1/4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Smart | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 149g (0.33 lb) | 260g (0.57 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-8L | NP-95 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $200 | $900 |