Canon A3300 IS vs Kodak M530
95 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
![Canon PowerShot A3300 IS front Canon PowerShot A3300 IS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-PowerShot-A3300-IS/Canon-A3300-IS-front.jpg)
![Kodak EasyShare M530 front Kodak EasyShare M530 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-M530/Kodak-M530-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Canon A3300 IS vs Kodak M530 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 149g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F) lens
- 150g - 94 x 57 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Canon A3300 IS vs Kodak M530 Overview
Below is a in-depth assessment of the Canon A3300 IS vs Kodak M530, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Canon and Kodak. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the A3300 IS (16MP) and M530 (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The A3300 IS was released 13 months later than the M530 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the A3300 IS grades against the M530 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Canon A3300 IS vs Kodak M530 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot A3300 IS & Kodak EasyShare M530. The complete galleries are provided at Canon A3300 IS Gallery & Kodak M530 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3300 IS over the Kodak M530
A3300 IS | M530 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 13 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Kodak M530 over the Canon A3300 IS
M530 | A3300 IS |
---|
Common features in the Canon A3300 IS and Kodak M530
A3300 IS | M530 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Canon A3300 IS vs Kodak M530 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Canon A3300 IS has got outer measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Kodak M530 has sizing of 94mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Examine the Canon A3300 IS vs Kodak M530 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the A3300 IS and the M530.
![Canon A3300 IS vs Kodak M530 size comparison Canon A3300 IS vs Kodak M530 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A3300-IS-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M530-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A3300 IS and M530 is 95 and 95 respectively.
![Canon A3300 IS vs Kodak M530 top view buttons comparison Canon A3300 IS vs Kodak M530 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A3300-IS-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M530-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon A3300 IS vs Kodak M530 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching specifications. The graphic here will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the A3300 IS and M530.
Plainly, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Canon A3300 IS to provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more modern A3300 IS is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
![Canon A3300 IS vs Kodak M530 sensor size comparison Canon A3300 IS vs Kodak M530 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A3300-IS-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M530-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon A3300 IS vs Kodak M530 Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon A3300 IS vs Kodak M530 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A3300 IS vs Kodak M530 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A3300-IS-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M530-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Canon A3300 IS vs Kodak M530 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A3300 IS | Kodak EasyShare M530 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Kodak |
Model type | Canon PowerShot A3300 IS | Kodak EasyShare M530 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-01-05 | 2010-01-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 1/8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/1400 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Smart | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 149 gr (0.33 pounds) | 150 gr (0.33 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 94 x 57 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-8L | KLIC-7006 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $200 | $110 |