Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SZ-12
95 Imaging
38 Features
30 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e584/1e584ce913888bf2630e888a0c14d21fa8119985" alt="Canon PowerShot A3300 IS front Canon PowerShot A3300 IS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8df78/8df78639e31f6f9cab0cd6bb2ccb49100f8299fb" alt="Olympus SZ-12 front Olympus SZ-12 front"
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SZ-12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 149g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Launched January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SZ-12 Overview
Here is a extensive comparison of the Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SZ-12, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the A3300 IS (16MP) and the SZ-12 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The A3300 IS was manufactured 12 months earlier than the SZ-12 which means that they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the A3300 IS scores vs the SZ-12 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SZ-12 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot A3300 IS and Olympus SZ-12. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon A3300 IS Gallery and Olympus SZ-12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3300 IS over the Olympus SZ-12
A3300 IS | SZ-12 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Canon A3300 IS
SZ-12 | A3300 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 12 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A3300 IS and Olympus SZ-12
A3300 IS | SZ-12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SZ-12 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon A3300 IS enjoys external dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Olympus SZ-12 has dimensions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SZ-12 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the A3300 IS against the SZ-12.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/545b9/545b9dab8ec93ac49836533c4c260c62b26a5615" alt="Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SZ-12 size comparison Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SZ-12 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A3300 IS and SZ-12 is 95 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/001d0/001d049289b5c448c3b2fc136124867ad31f40f8" alt="Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SZ-12 top view buttons comparison Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SZ-12 top view buttons comparison"
Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SZ-12 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by looking at technical specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the A3300 IS and SZ-12.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Canon A3300 IS to resolve extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older A3300 IS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9d88/c9d884af61f5e02ce2154197adfbf45d5a26c734" alt="Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SZ-12 sensor size comparison Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SZ-12 sensor size comparison"
Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9223f/9223fb3cd53c1aa85c6393cc0b56856fae6c7a1b" alt="Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SZ-12 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A3300 IS | Olympus SZ-12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon PowerShot A3300 IS | Olympus SZ-12 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/1700 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Smart | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 149g (0.33 lbs) | 226g (0.50 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 images | 220 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-8L | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $200 | $350 |