Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SH-2
95 Imaging
38 Features
30 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e584/1e584ce913888bf2630e888a0c14d21fa8119985" alt="Canon PowerShot A3300 IS front Canon PowerShot A3300 IS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac7d4/ac7d4b646d82f72e1235bc9a541f3ccc1d146b3c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-2 front Olympus Stylus SH-2 front"
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 149g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched March 2015
- Superseded the Olympus SH-1
- Later Model is Olympus SH-3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Canon A3300 IS versus Olympus SH-2, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the A3300 IS (16MP) and the SH-2 (16MP) is very similar and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The A3300 IS was released 5 years before the SH-2 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the A3300 IS grades against the SH-2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot A3300 IS and Olympus Stylus SH-2. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon A3300 IS Gallery and Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3300 IS over the Olympus SH-2
A3300 IS | SH-2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Canon A3300 IS
SH-2 | A3300 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2015 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 50 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon A3300 IS and Olympus SH-2
A3300 IS | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon A3300 IS provides outside measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Olympus SH-2 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Contrast the Canon A3300 IS versus Olympus SH-2 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the A3300 IS against the SH-2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf198/bf198dad7ce92490cfbbe23126f0de5fa62e9f04" alt="Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A3300 IS and SH-2 is 95 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/461f1/461f1aa5e010b1dfcd1d057501a92773500c1017" alt="Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison"
Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading a spec sheet. The image below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the A3300 IS and SH-2.
As you can see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same megapixels and you should expect similar quality of images though you need to take the release date of the products into consideration. The more aged A3300 IS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e78f5/e78f5041604b467b4603d82fd0ef6e8a06c824e5" alt="Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison"
Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b91b0/b91b052faae2fa627fef7d9d7d08ffd9ad16c4b0" alt="Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A3300 IS | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot A3300 IS | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2015-03-11 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 11.5 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Smart | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 149g (0.33 pounds) | 271g (0.60 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 photos | 380 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-8L | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $200 | $399 |