Clicky

Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
95 Imaging
38 Features
30 Overall
34
Canon PowerShot A3300 IS front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35

Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Canon A3300 IS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 149g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

The following is a in-depth analysis of the Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus TG-320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the A3300 IS (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The A3300 IS was manufactured 12 months earlier than the TG-320 so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the A3300 IS grades against the TG-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Canon A3300 IS over the Olympus TG-320

          

          

            
 A3300 IS TG-320 
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Canon A3300 IS

          

          

            
 TG-320 A3300 IS 
AnnouncedJanuary 2012January 2011Newer by 12 months
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Canon A3300 IS and Olympus TG-320

          

          

            
 A3300 IS TG-320 
Manual focus  No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen  Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Neither comes with Touch friendly screen
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
In case you're looking to travel with your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon A3300 IS comes with physical measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus TG-320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the A3300 IS vs the TG-320.
Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A3300 IS and TG-320 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Normally, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions merely by going through a spec sheet. The image here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the A3300 IS and TG-320.
Clearly, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Canon A3300 IS to produce greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged A3300 IS will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

            Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
 Canon A3300 IS as a Portrait photography camera
 Olympus TG-320 as a Portrait photography camera
34
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 comes with face detection autofocus
 focusing manually not possible
 manual exposure not possible
 can't use external flash
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
33
 good megapixels (14MP)
 supports face detect focusing
 no manual focus
 no manual control
 can't use external flash
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Street Comparison
Canon A3300 IS Street photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Street photography highlights
57
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 no articulating screen
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
66
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 weather proofing
 lighter than others in class (155 grams)
 no articulating screen
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Sports Comparison
 Canon A3300 IS as a Sports photography camera
 Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
40
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
 comes with tracking autofocus
 max fps low (1.0 frames/s)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect autofocus
40
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good megapixels (14MP)
 supports tracking focus
 weather proofing
 max fps very slow (1.0 fps)
 no shutter priority
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 terrible battery power (150 shots)
 has no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Travel Comparison
Canon A3300 IS Travel photography details
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography details
65
 megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 decently wide (28mm)
 doesn't have Time Lapse function
 doesn't contain selfie friendly display
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
67
 lighter than others in class (155 grams)
 weather proofing
 good megapixels (14MP)
 flash built-in
 decently wide (28mm)
 no Timelapse recording
 terrible battery power (150 shots)
 doesn't contain selfie friendly display
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary
Landscape Comparison
Canon A3300 IS Landscape photography details
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography details
42
 decently wide (28mm)
 screen is a good size (3")
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 focusing manually not possible
 can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
 manual exposure not possible
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
 doesn't have Time Lapse function
39
 decently wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good megapixels (14 megapixels)
 weather proofing
 no manual focus
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 tiny screen (2.7 inches)
 no manual control
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
 terrible battery power (150 shots)
 no Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Vlogging Comparison
Canon A3300 IS Vlogging highlights
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging highlights
31
 decently wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 comes with face detection autofocus
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
 doesn't contain selfie friendly display
 video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
 doesn't have external mic jack
32
 decently wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports face detect focusing
 lighter than others in class (155g)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 doesn't contain selfie friendly display
 low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
 no microphone jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
        
                
        

          

            
Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A3300 IS and Olympus TG-320
 Canon PowerShot A3300 ISOlympus TG-320
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Olympus
Model type Canon PowerShot A3300 IS Olympus TG-320
Type Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Revealed 2011-01-05 2012-01-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3 and  16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW files    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Touch to focus    
Continuous AF    
Single AF    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
Center weighted AF    
AF multi area    
Live view AF    
Face detect focusing    
Contract detect focusing    
Phase detect focusing    
Total focus points 9 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-5.9 f/3.5-5.1
Macro focusing range 3cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 2.7"
Display resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch screen    
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/1600s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Change WB    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 4.00 m 5.80 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Smart Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash    
Auto exposure bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 149 grams (0.33 lb) 155 grams (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 230 photos 150 photos
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NB-8L LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse feature    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $200 $0