Clicky

Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
30
Overall
35
Canon PowerShot A3300 IS front
 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49

Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

Canon A3300 IS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 149g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
  • Announced January 2011
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Launched December 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview

Here is a comprehensive overview of the Canon A3300 IS versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Canon and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the A3300 IS (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the A3300 IS (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") possess different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The A3300 IS was released 23 months earlier than the XZ-2 iHS which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the A3300 IS matches up vs the XZ-2 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon A3300 IS over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 A3300 IS XZ-2 iHS 

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Canon A3300 IS

 XZ-2 iHS A3300 IS 
LaunchedDecember 2012January 2011Fresher by 23 months
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Canon A3300 IS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 A3300 IS XZ-2 iHS 
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurements
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon A3300 IS offers external dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).

See the Canon A3300 IS versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the A3300 IS versus the XZ-2 iHS.

Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the A3300 IS and XZ-2 iHS is 95 and 85 respectively.

Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing just by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the A3300 IS and XZ-2 iHS.

Clearly, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The A3300 IS featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Canon A3300 IS will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older A3300 IS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A3300 IS as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
34
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
46
you can focus manually
has face detect focus
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Canon A3300 IS Street photography features
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography features
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
66
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
sensor is small (1/1.7")
heavier than average (346 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Canon A3300 IS Sports photography features
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography features
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
max fps low (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
good battery life (340 shots)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Canon A3300 IS Travel photography information
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography information
65
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
does not have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
61
good battery life (340 per charge)
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than average (346g)
low megapixels (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Canon A3300 IS Landscape photography information
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography information
43
rather wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
55
you can focus manually
relatively wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
good battery life (340 CIPA)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Canon A3300 IS
Vlogging with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
31
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focus
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic socket
36
relatively wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have mic support
display isn't selfie friendly
heavier than average (346 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon A3300 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A3300 IS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
 Canon PowerShot A3300 ISOlympus XZ-2 iHS
General Information
Company Canon Olympus
Model Canon PowerShot A3300 IS Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2011-01-05 2012-12-18
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 9 35
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-112mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-5.9 f/1.8-2.5
Macro focus range 3cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1600s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.00 m 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Smart Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 149 gr (0.33 lb) 346 gr (0.76 lb)
Dimensions 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 49
DXO Color Depth score not tested 20.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.3
DXO Low light score not tested 216
Other
Battery life 230 images 340 images
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NB-8L Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at release $200 $450