Canon A3300 IS vs Samsung SL202
95 Imaging
38 Features
30 Overall
34
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Canon A3300 IS vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 149g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Other Name is PL50
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon A3300 IS vs Samsung SL202 Overview
The following is a extensive assessment of the Canon A3300 IS vs Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Canon and Samsung. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the A3300 IS (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe A3300 IS was manufactured 23 months after the SL202 making them a generation away from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief summation of how the A3300 IS grades versus the SL202 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon A3300 IS vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A3300 IS & Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are provided at Canon A3300 IS Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3300 IS over the Samsung SL202
| A3300 IS | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 23 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Canon A3300 IS
| SL202 | A3300 IS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon A3300 IS and Samsung SL202
| A3300 IS | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Canon A3300 IS vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon A3300 IS offers external measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Canon A3300 IS vs Samsung SL202 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the A3300 IS vs the SL202.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the A3300 IS and SL202 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Canon A3300 IS vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specs. The picture below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the A3300 IS and SL202.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Canon A3300 IS to deliver greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher A3300 IS should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon A3300 IS vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon A3300 IS vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3300 IS | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A3300 IS | Samsung SL202 |
| Alternate name | - | PL50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Smart | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 149g (0.33 pounds) | 168g (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-8L | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $200 | $140 |