Canon A3400 IS vs Canon ELPH 530 HS
96 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
95 Imaging
33 Features
40 Overall
35
Canon A3400 IS vs Canon ELPH 530 HS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 126g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 163g - 86 x 54 x 20mm
- Launched February 2012
- Also referred to as IXUS 510 HS
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon A3400 IS vs Canon ELPH 530 HS Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Canon A3400 IS and Canon ELPH 530 HS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both sold by Canon. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the A3400 IS (16MP) and ELPH 530 HS (10MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe A3400 IS was unveiled about the same time to the ELPH 530 HS which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the A3400 IS scores against the ELPH 530 HS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon A3400 IS vs Canon ELPH 530 HS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot A3400 IS and Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS. The full galleries are viewable at Canon A3400 IS Gallery and Canon ELPH 530 HS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3400 IS over the Canon ELPH 530 HS
| A3400 IS | ELPH 530 HS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 530 HS over the Canon A3400 IS
| ELPH 530 HS | A3400 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A3400 IS and Canon ELPH 530 HS
| A3400 IS | ELPH 530 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 | February 2012 | Similar generation | |
| Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Canon A3400 IS vs Canon ELPH 530 HS Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Canon A3400 IS comes with physical measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Canon ELPH 530 HS has sizing of 86mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs).
See the Canon A3400 IS and Canon ELPH 530 HS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the A3400 IS against the ELPH 530 HS.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the A3400 IS and ELPH 530 HS is 96 and 95 respectively.
Canon A3400 IS vs Canon ELPH 530 HS Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes just by going over a spec sheet. The picture underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the A3400 IS and ELPH 530 HS.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should count on the Canon A3400 IS to offer more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots more aggressively.
Canon A3400 IS vs Canon ELPH 530 HS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon A3400 IS vs Canon ELPH 530 HS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Canon |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS |
| Also called as | - | IXUS 510 HS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-02-07 | 2012-02-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | DIGIC 5 |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-336mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.4-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 461k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | PureColor II Touch TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 15 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 2.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 126 gr (0.28 lb) | 163 gr (0.36 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 86 x 54 x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | 190 photos |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-11L | NB-9L |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $230 | $250 |