Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm Z33WP
96 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
96 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm Z33WP Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 126g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced July 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm Z33WP Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Canon A3400 IS versus Fujifilm Z33WP, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and FujiFilm. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the A3400 IS (16MP) and Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe A3400 IS was brought out 2 years after the Fujifilm Z33WP which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the A3400 IS scores against the Fujifilm Z33WP with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot A3400 IS & Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP. The entire galleries are provided at Canon A3400 IS Gallery & Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3400 IS over the Fujifilm Z33WP
| A3400 IS | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 32 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Canon A3400 IS
| Fujifilm Z33WP | A3400 IS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon A3400 IS and Fujifilm Z33WP
| A3400 IS | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm Z33WP Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon A3400 IS provides physical measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Fujifilm Z33WP has dimensions of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Check the Canon A3400 IS versus Fujifilm Z33WP in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the A3400 IS versus the Fujifilm Z33WP.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the A3400 IS and Fujifilm Z33WP is 96 and 96 respectively.
Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm Z33WP Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by viewing technical specs. The pic underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the A3400 IS and Fujifilm Z33WP.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Canon A3400 IS to provide you with more detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The fresher A3400 IS provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm Z33WP Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm Z33WP Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-02-07 | 2009-07-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 8cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.90 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 126 gr (0.28 lb) | 110 gr (0.24 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-11L | NP-45 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $230 | $197 |