Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
96 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
91 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 126g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the A3400 IS (16MP) and the TG-850 iHS (16MP) is very close and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe A3400 IS was released 24 months earlier than the TG-850 iHS making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the A3400 IS scores against the TG-850 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot A3400 IS and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Canon A3400 IS Gallery and Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3400 IS over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
| A3400 IS | TG-850 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Canon A3400 IS
| TG-850 iHS | A3400 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | February 2012 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A3400 IS and Olympus TG-850 iHS
| A3400 IS | TG-850 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Canon A3400 IS provides exterior measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Olympus TG-850 iHS has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Contrast the Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the A3400 IS against the TG-850 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the A3400 IS and TG-850 iHS is 96 and 91 respectively.
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing just by researching specifications. The graphic underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the A3400 IS and TG-850 iHS.
To sum up, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP therefore you should expect comparable quality of files though you should take the production date of the cameras into account. The older A3400 IS will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2014-01-29 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4616 x 3464 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 1/2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 126 gr (0.28 lb) | 218 gr (0.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | 330 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-11L | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $230 | $250 |