Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
96 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 126g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Canon A3400 IS versus Olympus TG-2 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Olympus. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the A3400 IS (16MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segmentsThe A3400 IS was released 16 months earlier than the TG-2 iHS which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the A3400 IS matches up against the TG-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A3400 IS and Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon A3400 IS Gallery and Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3400 IS over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| A3400 IS | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Canon A3400 IS
| TG-2 iHS | A3400 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2013 |  | February 2012 | Fresher by 16 months |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A3400 IS and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| A3400 IS | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon A3400 IS has got outside dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Canon A3400 IS versus Olympus TG-2 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the A3400 IS against the TG-2 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the A3400 IS and TG-2 iHS is 96 and 91 respectively.
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at technical specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the A3400 IS and TG-2 iHS.
As you have seen, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should expect the Canon A3400 IS to give greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older A3400 IS is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observationsVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-02-07 | 2013-06-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 610k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 126 gr (0.28 lbs) | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | 350 photos |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-11L | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $230 | $380 |
