Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III
96 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccb6b/ccb6b3fe7e5768767ebefc5261219b57dfff69cf" alt="Canon PowerShot A3400 IS front Canon PowerShot A3400 IS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0394/c039434b1259b0983aa2fa353205f299c35090eb" alt="Ricoh GR Digital III front Ricoh GR Digital III front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 126g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
- Renewed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Canon A3400 IS versus Ricoh GR Digital III, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Canon and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the A3400 IS (16MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the A3400 IS (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The A3400 IS was manufactured 2 years after the GR Digital III which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise overview of how the A3400 IS scores versus the GR Digital III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A3400 IS & Ricoh GR Digital III. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon A3400 IS Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3400 IS over the Ricoh GR Digital III
A3400 IS | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 31 months |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Canon A3400 IS
GR Digital III | A3400 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A3400 IS and Ricoh GR Digital III
A3400 IS | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon A3400 IS has outer measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Compare the Canon A3400 IS versus Ricoh GR Digital III in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the A3400 IS compared to the GR Digital III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3138a/3138a19e24bb764f075e05751c6015071efef3ac" alt="Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the A3400 IS and GR Digital III is 96 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60932/60932cfaf19422ca416584654d2719a7482a36fc" alt="Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison"
Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions only by looking at a spec sheet. The pic here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the A3400 IS and GR Digital III.
As you can see, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The A3400 IS because of its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh tougher and the Canon A3400 IS will give you greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The more modern A3400 IS is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94137/9413769b7444159440d6c3c60db135813d3596c5" alt="Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison"
Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18807/18807267993fd4fd855148ae3ba6a8a8b5ebe707" alt="Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Ricoh |
Model | Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-02-07 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 1 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 126 gr (0.28 pounds) | 208 gr (0.46 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-11L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $230 | $399 |