Canon A3400 IS vs Samsung WB30F
Portability
96 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
96 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Canon A3400 IS vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
Canon A3400 IS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 126g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Revealed February 2012
Samsung WB30F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon A3400 IS vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Below is a extensive analysis of the Canon A3400 IS and Samsung WB30F, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Canon and Samsung. The image resolution of the A3400 IS (16MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is fairly similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe A3400 IS was introduced 11 months prior to the WB30F so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the A3400 IS grades versus the WB30F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Canon A3400 IS vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A3400 IS & Samsung WB30F. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon A3400 IS Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3400 IS over the Samsung WB30F
| A3400 IS | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Canon A3400 IS
| WB30F | A3400 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | February 2012 | More recent by 11 months |
Common features in the Canon A3400 IS and Samsung WB30F
| A3400 IS | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Canon A3400 IS vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon A3400 IS enjoys outer measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung WB30F has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Analyze the Canon A3400 IS and Samsung WB30F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the A3400 IS compared to the WB30F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the A3400 IS and WB30F is 96 and 96 respectively.
Canon A3400 IS vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements simply by going over technical specs. The graphic below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the A3400 IS and WB30F.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP so you can expect similar quality of photographs but you have to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The older A3400 IS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Canon A3400 IS vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Canon A3400 IS
Portrait photography with Samsung WB30F
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
offers face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Street photography with Canon A3400 IS
Street photography with Samsung WB30F
image stabilization (Optical)
offers focus by touch
lighter than others in class (126 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (128g)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Canon A3400 IS as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB30F as a Sports photography camera
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
low frames per second (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
bad battery power (180 per charge)
does not have phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Canon A3400 IS Travel photography information
Samsung WB30F Travel photography information
lighter than others in class (126g)
offers focus by touch
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
bad battery power (180 shots)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
lighter than others in class (128g)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.1)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Canon A3400 IS as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB30F as a Landscape photography camera
pretty wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
no manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
bad battery power (180 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
really wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
no manual mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Canon A3400 IS as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB30F as a Vlogging camera
pretty wide (28mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focusing
lighter than others in class (126 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone socket
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
lighter than others in class (128g)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon A3400 IS vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Samsung WB30F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 126g (0.28 lb) | 128g (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-11L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $230 | $180 |