Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
96 Imaging
40 Features
35 Overall
38
![Canon PowerShot A3500 IS front Canon PowerShot A3500 IS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-PowerShot-A3500-IS/Canon-A3500-IS-front.jpg)
![Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Tough-TG-1-iHS/Olympus-TG-1-iHS-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 135g - 98 x 56 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Announced May 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Canon A3500 IS versus Olympus TG-1 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the A3500 IS (16MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The A3500 IS was unveiled 9 months later than the TG-1 iHS which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a brief view of how the A3500 IS scores vs the TG-1 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot A3500 IS and Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Canon A3500 IS Gallery and Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3500 IS over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
A3500 IS | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | May 2012 | More recent by 9 months |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Canon A3500 IS
TG-1 iHS | A3500 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A3500 IS and Olympus TG-1 iHS
A3500 IS | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon A3500 IS has got external dimensions of 98mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus TG-1 iHS has proportions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Canon A3500 IS versus Olympus TG-1 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the A3500 IS versus the TG-1 iHS.
![Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS size comparison Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A3500-IS-vs-Olympus-Tough-TG-1-iHS-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A3500 IS and TG-1 iHS is 96 and 91 respectively.
![Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS top view buttons comparison Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A3500-IS-vs-Olympus-Tough-TG-1-iHS-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements merely by viewing technical specs. The visual underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A3500 IS and TG-1 iHS.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Canon A3500 IS to provide you with more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern A3500 IS provides an edge in sensor tech.
![Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS sensor size comparison Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A3500-IS-vs-Olympus-Tough-TG-1-iHS-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A3500-IS-vs-Olympus-Tough-TG-1-iHS-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Canon PowerShot A3500 IS | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon PowerShot A3500 IS | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2012-05-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 4 | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 135g (0.30 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 56 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 images | 350 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-11L | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $115 | $399 |