Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
96 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 135g - 98 x 56 x 20mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Canon A3500 IS versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the A3500 IS (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the A3500 IS (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe A3500 IS was manufactured about the same time to the XZ-2 iHS so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the A3500 IS grades versus the XZ-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A3500 IS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Canon A3500 IS Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3500 IS over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| A3500 IS | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Canon A3500 IS
| XZ-2 iHS | A3500 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A3500 IS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| A3500 IS | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | December 2012 | Same generation |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon A3500 IS offers physical measurements of 98mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check out the Canon A3500 IS versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the A3500 IS against the XZ-2 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A3500 IS and XZ-2 iHS is 96 and 85 respectively.
Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions only by researching specs. The image underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the A3500 IS and XZ-2 iHS.
All in all, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The A3500 IS featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Canon A3500 IS will provide you with greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively.
Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon A3500 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3500 IS | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A3500 IS | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 135g (0.30 lbs) | 346g (0.76 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 56 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 shots | 340 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-11L | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $115 | $450 |