Canon A4000 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1
95 Imaging
39 Features
29 Overall
35
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Canon A4000 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 145g - 95 x 56 x 24mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon A4000 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Canon A4000 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Ricoh. The resolution of the A4000 IS (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe A4000 IS was manufactured 3 years before the WG-M1 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the A4000 IS matches up versus the WG-M1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon A4000 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot A4000 IS & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon A4000 IS Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A4000 IS over the Ricoh WG-M1
| A4000 IS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 115k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Canon A4000 IS
| WG-M1 | A4000 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 | February 2012 | Fresher by 31 months |
Common features in the Canon A4000 IS and Ricoh WG-M1
| A4000 IS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Canon A4000 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Canon A4000 IS enjoys outer measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Canon A4000 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the A4000 IS against the WG-M1.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A4000 IS and WG-M1 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Canon A4000 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing only by reviewing specs. The visual underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the A4000 IS and WG-M1.
As you can plainly see, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Canon A4000 IS to deliver more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older A4000 IS is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Canon A4000 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon A4000 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A4000 IS | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A4000 IS | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-02-07 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 1.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 145 grams (0.32 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 175 images | 350 images |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-11L | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $199 | $2,000 |