Canon A480 vs Kodak Touch
94 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2462f/2462f44bceca65903b4c63a9006e18d4b732cb32" alt="Canon PowerShot A480 front Canon PowerShot A480 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ded3/1ded3e1e0179a1da59d37bb7a9cb573d351b5faf" alt="Kodak EasyShare Touch front Kodak EasyShare Touch front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Canon A480 vs Kodak Touch Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 140g - 92 x 62 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Released January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon A480 vs Kodak Touch Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Canon A480 and Kodak Touch, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Canon and Kodak. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the A480 (10MP) and Touch (14MP) and the A480 (1/2.3") and Touch (1/3") possess different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The A480 was launched 23 months prior to the Touch which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise overview of how the A480 matches up versus the Touch when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon A480 vs Kodak Touch Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot A480 & Kodak EasyShare Touch. The complete galleries are provided at Canon A480 Gallery & Kodak Touch Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A480 over the Kodak Touch
A480 | Touch |
---|
Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Canon A480
Touch | A480 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 23 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 115k | Sharper screen (+345k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon A480 and Kodak Touch
A480 | Touch | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Canon A480 vs Kodak Touch Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and size. The Canon A480 provides external dimensions of 92mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) and the Kodak Touch has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Examine the Canon A480 and Kodak Touch in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the A480 versus the Touch.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0901/d0901d650aa53b3090bcea778f360289ddfd63df" alt="Canon A480 vs Kodak Touch size comparison Canon A480 vs Kodak Touch size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A480 and Touch is 94 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/acbb2/acbb2254c79d5de992ad7ce337d62d0fcc857c9e" alt="Canon A480 vs Kodak Touch top view buttons comparison Canon A480 vs Kodak Touch top view buttons comparison"
Canon A480 vs Kodak Touch Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions only by going through specs. The pic here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A480 and Touch.
All in all, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The A480 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Kodak Touch will provide extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged A480 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5c13/e5c13800c9ddf93ab839ba0c45b4cbc337e06ad6" alt="Canon A480 vs Kodak Touch sensor size comparison Canon A480 vs Kodak Touch sensor size comparison"
Canon A480 vs Kodak Touch Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12059/12059caa4d8ec4646c51b3d99216182a51200699" alt="Canon A480 vs Kodak Touch Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A480 vs Kodak Touch Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon A480 vs Kodak Touch Specifications
Canon PowerShot A480 | Kodak EasyShare Touch | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Kodak |
Model type | Canon PowerShot A480 | Kodak EasyShare Touch |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2009-01-15 | 2011-01-04 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 17.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 5 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 7.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 115k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/500s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 140g (0.31 lbs) | 150g (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 92 x 62 x 31mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | 2 x AA | KLIC-7006 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $210 | $100 |