Canon A490 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Canon A490 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
Canon A490 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Canon A490 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the A490 (10MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is very close and they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe A490 was released 3 years before the TG-820 iHS which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the A490 grades vs the TG-820 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon A490 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot A490 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Canon A490 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A490 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
A490 | TG-820 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Canon A490
TG-820 iHS | A490 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | January 2010 | Newer by 25 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1030k | 115k | Crisper display (+915k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A490 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
A490 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Canon A490 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon A490 has got external dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has proportions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon A490 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the A490 versus the TG-820 iHS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A490 and TG-820 iHS is 93 and 92 respectively.
Canon A490 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specs. The pic here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the A490 and TG-820 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-820 iHS to result in more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged A490 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon A490 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon A490 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Canon PowerShot A490 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon PowerShot A490 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2010-01-05 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 5 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 115k dot | 1,030k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 175 grams (0.39 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 2 x AA | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $99 | $500 |