Clicky

Canon A490 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Canon PowerShot A490 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Canon A490 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Canon A490
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced July 2011
  • Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon A490 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Its time to examine more in depth at the Canon A490 versus Olympus VR-320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Canon and Olympus. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the A490 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The A490 was unveiled 18 months prior to the VR-320 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the A490 grades against the VR-320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Canon A490 over the Olympus VR-320

 A490 VR-320 

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Canon A490

 VR-320 A490 
IntroducedJuly 2011January 2010Fresher by 18 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution230k115kClearer display (+115k dot)

Common features in the Canon A490 and Olympus VR-320

 A490 VR-320 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Canon A490 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon A490 offers outside measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

See the Canon A490 versus Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the A490 compared to the VR-320.

Canon A490 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the A490 and VR-320 is 93 and 94 respectively.

Canon A490 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Canon A490 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing just by researching specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the A490 and VR-320.

All in all, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus VR-320 to result in more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics much more aggressively. The older A490 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Canon A490 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Canon A490 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A490 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon A490
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-320
19
no manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
33
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Canon A490 Street photography factors
Olympus VR-320 Street photography factors
46
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon A490
Sports photography with Olympus VR-320
16
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
47
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
supports tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Canon A490 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Travel photography camera
50
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse mode
MP count low (10MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
70
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Canon A490 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Landscape photography camera
22
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
tiny screen (2.5")
no manual control
no image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
42
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual exposure
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A490 Vlogging advice
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging advice
21
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of microphone socket
32
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
lighter than average in class (158g)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon A490 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A490 and Olympus VR-320
 Canon PowerShot A490Olympus VR-320
General Information
Brand Canon Olympus
Model type Canon PowerShot A490 Olympus VR-320
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2010-01-05 2011-07-19
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 5 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 37-122mm (3.3x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Highest aperture f/3.0-5.8 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5" 3"
Display resolution 115k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 1.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 175g (0.39 pounds) 158g (0.35 pounds)
Dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 2 x AA LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus SD/SDHC
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $99 $179