Canon A495 vs Casio EX-H20G
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-H20G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Released September 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon A495 vs Casio EX-H20G Overview
The following is a detailed assessment of the Canon A495 and Casio EX-H20G, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Canon and Casio. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and EX-H20G (14MP) but they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe A495 was launched 8 months earlier than the EX-H20G so they are of a similar age. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the A495 matches up vs the EX-H20G in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Canon A495 vs Casio EX-H20G Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot A495 & Casio Exilim EX-H20G. The complete galleries are available at Canon A495 Gallery & Casio EX-H20G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Casio EX-H20G
| A495 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Canon A495
| EX-H20G | A495 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2010 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 8 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+346k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Casio EX-H20G
| A495 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-H20G Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon A495 enjoys exterior dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-H20G has sizing of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Canon A495 and Casio EX-H20G in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the A495 and the EX-H20G.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A495 and EX-H20G is 93 and 91 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-H20G Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specifications. The pic here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the A495 and EX-H20G.
To sum up, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-H20G to give you more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged A495 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-H20G Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-H20G Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A495 | Casio Exilim EX-H20G |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-05 | 2010-09-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Exilim Engine HS |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/3.2-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 115k dots | 461k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175 grams (0.39 lbs) | 216 grams (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | NP-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $109 | $300 |