Clicky

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-H30

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Canon PowerShot A495 front
 
Casio Exilim EX-H30 front
Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
40
Overall
39

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-H30 Key Specs

Canon A495
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
  • Released January 2010
Casio EX-H30
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-H30 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Canon A495 versus Casio EX-H30, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Canon and Casio. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and EX-H30 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The A495 was manufactured 12 months earlier than the EX-H30 and they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief view of how the A495 grades versus the EX-H30 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Casio EX-H30

 A495 EX-H30 

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Canon A495

 EX-H30 A495 
IntroducedJanuary 2011January 2010More recent by 12 months
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution461k115kClearer display (+346k dot)

Common features in the Canon A495 and Casio EX-H30

 A495 EX-H30 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-H30 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon A495 has got exterior measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Casio EX-H30 has measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs).

Analyze the Canon A495 versus Casio EX-H30 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the A495 versus the EX-H30.

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-H30 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A495 and EX-H30 is 93 and 92 respectively.

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-H30 top view buttons comparison

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-H30 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements purely by checking specifications. The photograph here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the A495 and EX-H30.

To sum up, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should anticipate the Casio EX-H30 to give you greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older A495 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-H30 sensor size comparison

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-H30 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-H30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A495 Portrait photography info
Casio EX-H30 Portrait photography info
19
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
39
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Canon A495 Street photography factors
Casio EX-H30 Street photography factors
46
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (201 grams)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Canon A495 Sports photography advice
Casio EX-H30 Sports photography advice
16
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
52
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Canon A495 Travel photography info
Casio EX-H30 Travel photography info
50
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
69
lighter than competitors in class (201g)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
missing Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Canon A495 as a Landscape photography camera
Casio EX-H30 as a Landscape photography camera
22
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
does not have Time Lapse recording
49
you can focus manually
really wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A495 as a Vlogging camera
Casio EX-H30 as a Vlogging camera
21
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have external mic jack
30
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (201g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external mic port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-H30 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A495 and Casio EX-H30
 Canon PowerShot A495Casio Exilim EX-H30
General Information
Brand Name Canon Casio
Model Canon PowerShot A495 Casio Exilim EX-H30
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2010-01-05 2011-01-05
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Exilim Engine 5.0
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 37-122mm (3.3x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0-5.8 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 115 thousand dot 461 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology - Super Clear TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175g (0.39 lbs) 201g (0.44 lbs)
Physical dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA NP-130
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus -
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $109 $709