Clicky

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-Z33

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Canon PowerShot A495 front
 
Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front
Portability
97
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-Z33 Key Specs

Canon A495
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
  • Launched January 2010
Casio EX-Z33
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
  • Introduced August 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-Z33 Overview

The following is a comprehensive overview of the Canon A495 versus Casio EX-Z33, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and Casio. The resolution of the A495 (10MP) and the EX-Z33 (10MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The A495 was revealed 5 months after the EX-Z33 which means that they are of a similar generation. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the A495 grades against the EX-Z33 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Casio EX-Z33

 A495 EX-Z33 

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Canon A495

 EX-Z33 A495 
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Display resolution230k115kClearer display (+115k dot)

Common features in the Canon A495 and Casio EX-Z33

 A495 EX-Z33 
IntroducedJanuary 2010August 2009Similar generation
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions2.5"2.5"Equal display measurement
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-Z33 Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon A495 has got outer dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-Z33 has proportions of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs).

Contrast the Canon A495 versus Casio EX-Z33 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the A495 against the EX-Z33.

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-Z33 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the A495 and EX-Z33 is 93 and 97 respectively.

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-Z33 top view buttons comparison

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-Z33 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions merely by checking specifications. The picture here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the A495 and EX-Z33.

Plainly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of photographs although you would want to take the production date of the products into consideration.

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-Z33 sensor size comparison

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-Z33 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-Z33 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A495 Portrait photography factors
Casio EX-Z33 Portrait photography factors
19
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
26
manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
low MP (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon A495
Street photography with Casio EX-Z33
46
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
55
lighter than competitors in class (106g)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon A495
Sports photography with Casio EX-Z33
16
max fps low (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
16
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Canon A495 Travel photography info
Casio EX-Z33 Travel photography info
50
built-in flash
no Time Lapse mode
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
56
lighter than competitors in class (106 grams)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse mode
low MP (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Canon A495 Landscape photography highlights
Casio EX-Z33 Landscape photography highlights
22
manual focus not available
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
27
manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A495 Vlogging details
Casio EX-Z33 Vlogging details
21
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
no external mic socket
25
lighter than competitors in class (106 grams)
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of microphone socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-Z33 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A495 and Casio EX-Z33
 Canon PowerShot A495Casio Exilim EX-Z33
General Information
Brand Name Canon Casio
Model Canon PowerShot A495 Casio Exilim EX-Z33
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-01-05 2009-08-31
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 64
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 37-122mm (3.3x) 36-107mm (3.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.0-5.8 f/3.1-5.6
Macro focus distance 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 2.5 inch
Resolution of screen 115k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m 2.80 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175 grams (0.39 lbs) 106 grams (0.23 lbs)
Physical dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA NP-82
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $109 $120