Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR1000
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23


90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR1000 Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR1000, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Canon and Casio. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and EX-ZR1000 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The A495 was introduced 3 years earlier than the EX-ZR1000 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the A495 grades vs the EX-ZR1000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot A495 and Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000. The whole galleries are available at Canon A495 Gallery and Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
A495 | EX-ZR1000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Canon A495
EX-ZR1000 | A495 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2012 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 33 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 115k | Clearer display (+346k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Casio EX-ZR1000
A495 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR1000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Canon A495 offers outside dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Casio EX-ZR1000 has specifications of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs).
Analyze the Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR1000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the A495 against the EX-ZR1000.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the A495 and EX-ZR1000 is 93 and 90 respectively.

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR1000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions merely by researching technical specs. The pic below will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A495 and EX-ZR1000.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR1000 to render greater detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged A495 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR1000 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR1000 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A495 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Casio |
Model | Canon PowerShot A495 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-01-05 | 2012-09-25 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | EXILIM Engine HS 3 |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 115k dots | 461k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 175g (0.39 lb) | 255g (0.56 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 470 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 2 x AA | NP-130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $109 | $572 |