Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR400
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR400, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Canon and Casio. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and EX-ZR400 (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe A495 was unveiled 4 years prior to the EX-ZR400 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the A495 grades against the EX-ZR400 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot A495 & Casio Exilim EX-ZR400. The full galleries are provided at Canon A495 Gallery & Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| A495 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Canon A495
| EX-ZR400 | A495 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 37 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+346k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Casio EX-ZR400
| A495 | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon A495 enjoys exterior measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-ZR400 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR400 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the A495 against the EX-ZR400.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the A495 and EX-ZR400 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes simply by viewing specifications. The image here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the A495 and EX-ZR400.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR400 to render more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged A495 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A495 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-01-05 | 2013-01-29 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Exilim Engine HS |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 15 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 30.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 lb) | 205g (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 500 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | NP-130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $109 | $0 |