Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR700
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR700, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Canon and Casio. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and EX-ZR700 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe A495 was launched 4 years prior to the EX-ZR700 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the A495 matches up vs the EX-ZR700 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A495 and Casio Exilim EX-ZR700. The complete galleries are provided at Canon A495 Gallery and Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| A495 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Canon A495
| EX-ZR700 | A495 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 37 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Casio EX-ZR700
| A495 | EX-ZR700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon A495 comes with physical measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Casio EX-ZR700 has dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR700 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view scale comparison of the A495 vs the EX-ZR700.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A495 and EX-ZR700 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes merely by going over a spec sheet. The pic here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the A495 and EX-ZR700.
As you can see, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should expect the Casio EX-ZR700 to offer greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged A495 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A495 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-01-05 | 2013-01-29 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | EXILIM Engine HS 3 |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 115k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 pounds) | 222g (0.49 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 470 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | NP-130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $109 | $370 |