Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR800
93 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released August 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Overview
Here is a extended review of the Canon A495 versus Casio EX-ZR800, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Casio. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and EX-ZR800 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe A495 was launched 4 years before the EX-ZR800 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the A495 matches up against the EX-ZR800 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot A495 & Casio Exilim EX-ZR800. The complete galleries are available at Canon A495 Gallery & Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| A495 | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Canon A495
| EX-ZR800 | A495 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2013 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 43 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+807k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Casio EX-ZR800
| A495 | EX-ZR800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Canon A495 provides physical dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Casio EX-ZR800 has specifications of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Canon A495 versus Casio EX-ZR800 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the A495 compared to the EX-ZR800.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A495 and EX-ZR800 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing technical specs. The graphic below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the A495 and EX-ZR800.
As you have seen, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR800 to show extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older A495 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A495 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-01-05 | 2013-08-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | EXILIM Engine HS 3 |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 4cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 115k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 pounds) | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 470 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | NP-130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $109 | $429 |