Clicky

Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JV200

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Canon PowerShot A495 front
 
FujiFilm FinePix JV200 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
18
Overall
29

Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JV200 Key Specs

Canon A495
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
  • Launched January 2010
FujiFilm JV200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 36-108mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 125g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
  • Revealed January 2011
  • Additionally referred to as FinePix JV205
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JV200 Overview

Below, we are comparing the Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JV200, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and FujiFilm. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and JV200 (14MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The A495 was released 12 months earlier than the JV200 so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the A495 grades vs the JV200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the FujiFilm JV200

 A495 JV200 

Reasons to pick FujiFilm JV200 over the Canon A495

 JV200 A495 
RevealedJanuary 2011January 2010More modern by 12 months
Display dimension2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k115kSharper display (+115k dot)

Common features in the Canon A495 and FujiFilm JV200

 A495 JV200 
Manual focus Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JV200 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon A495 enjoys external dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the FujiFilm JV200 has proportions of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Check out the Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JV200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the A495 against the JV200.

Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JV200 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the A495 and JV200 is 93 and 96 respectively.

Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JV200 top view buttons comparison

Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JV200 Sensor Comparison

Often, its difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading a spec sheet. The pic below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the A495 and JV200.

Clearly, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the FujiFilm JV200 to offer more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged A495 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JV200 sensor size comparison

Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JV200 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JV200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon A495
Portrait photography with FujiFilm JV200
19
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
28
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Canon A495 Street photography advice
FujiFilm JV200 Street photography advice
46
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
56
lighter than competitors (125 grams)
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Canon A495 as a Sports photography camera
FujiFilm JV200 as a Sports photography camera
16
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
29
MP count decent (14MP)
features tracking autofocus
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400s)
slow fps (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
bad battery (180 per charge)
has no phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Canon A495 Travel photography features
FujiFilm JV200 Travel photography features
50
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse mode
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (37mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
60
lighter than competitors (125 grams)
MP count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse recording
bad battery (180 shots)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Canon A495 Landscape photography info
FujiFilm JV200 Landscape photography info
22
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (37mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen is small (2.5")
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
does not have Time Lapse mode
28
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
bad battery (180 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Canon A495
Vlogging with FujiFilm JV200
21
wide angle not great (37mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external mic support
25
lighter than competitors (125g)
wide angle not good (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JV200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A495 and FujiFilm JV200
 Canon PowerShot A495FujiFilm FinePix JV200
General Information
Company Canon FujiFilm
Model Canon PowerShot A495 FujiFilm FinePix JV200
Otherwise known as - FinePix JV205
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-01-05 2011-01-05
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Maximum boosted ISO - 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 37-122mm (3.3x) 36-108mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.8 f/3.1-5.6
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 115k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1400 secs
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175 grams (0.39 lbs) 125 grams (0.28 lbs)
Dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 180 pictures
Battery style - AA
Battery model 2 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus SD / SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $109 $49