Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JX350
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
![Canon PowerShot A495 front Canon PowerShot A495 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-PowerShot-A495/Canon-A495-front.jpg)
![FujiFilm FinePix JX350 front FujiFilm FinePix JX350 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-JX350/FujiFilm-JX350-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JX350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.6-6.2) lens
- 130g - 94 x 56 x 24mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Other Name is FinePix JX355
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JX350 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Canon A495 and FujiFilm JX350, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and FujiFilm. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and JX350 (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The A495 was brought out 12 months before the JX350 so they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the A495 matches up versus the JX350 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JX350 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot A495 and FujiFilm FinePix JX350. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon A495 Gallery and FujiFilm JX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the FujiFilm JX350
A495 | JX350 |
---|
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JX350 over the Canon A495
JX350 | A495 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 12 months |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 115k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and FujiFilm JX350
A495 | JX350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JX350 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon A495 has got exterior measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the FujiFilm JX350 has sizing of 94mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs).
Check the Canon A495 and FujiFilm JX350 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the A495 vs the JX350.
![Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JX350 size comparison Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JX350 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A495-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-JX350-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the A495 and JX350 is 93 and 95 respectively.
![Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JX350 top view buttons comparison Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JX350 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A495-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-JX350-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JX350 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements only by reading specifications. The visual underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the A495 and JX350.
To sum up, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the FujiFilm JX350 to deliver extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older A495 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
![Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JX350 sensor size comparison Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JX350 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A495-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-JX350-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JX350 Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JX350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JX350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A495-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-JX350-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Canon A495 vs FujiFilm JX350 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A495 | FujiFilm FinePix JX350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model | Canon PowerShot A495 | FujiFilm FinePix JX350 |
Also called | - | FinePix JX355 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-01-05 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3440 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/2.6-6.2 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 115k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1800 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 175 grams (0.39 pounds) | 130 grams (0.29 pounds) |
Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 94 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 180 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 2 x AA | NP-45A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD / SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $109 | $200 |