Clicky

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm JX370

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Canon PowerShot A495 front
 
Fujifilm FinePix JX370 front
Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
22
Overall
31

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm JX370 Key Specs

Canon A495
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
  • Announced January 2010
Fujifilm JX370
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F2.6-6.2) lens
  • 124g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
  • Launched August 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm JX370 Overview

Below is a complete analysis of the Canon A495 vs Fujifilm JX370, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Canon and FujiFilm. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and Fujifilm JX370 (14MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The A495 was introduced 19 months before the Fujifilm JX370 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the A495 matches up against the Fujifilm JX370 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

				

Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Fujifilm JX370

 A495 Fujifilm JX370 

Reasons to pick Fujifilm JX370 over the Canon A495

 Fujifilm JX370 A495 
LaunchedAugust 2011January 2010More recent by 19 months
Screen dimensions2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution230k115kSharper screen (+115k dot)

Common features in the Canon A495 and Fujifilm JX370

 A495 Fujifilm JX370 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm JX370 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon A495 provides outside dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm JX370 has proportions of 95mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).

Look at the Canon A495 vs Fujifilm JX370 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the A495 vs the Fujifilm JX370.

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm JX370 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the A495 and Fujifilm JX370 is 93 and 95 respectively.

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm JX370 top view buttons comparison

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm JX370 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements just by reviewing specs. The visual here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the A495 and Fujifilm JX370.

All in all, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Fujifilm JX370 to deliver greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The older A495 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm JX370 sensor size comparison

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm JX370 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm JX370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A495 Portrait photography details
Fujifilm JX370 Portrait photography details
19
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
28
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Canon A495 Street photography info
Fujifilm JX370 Street photography info
46
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
55
lighter than others in class (124g)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Canon A495 Sports photography details
Fujifilm JX370 Sports photography details
16
low frames per second (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
31
MP count decent (14MP)
includes tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
low battery pack (190 CIPA)
lack of phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Canon A495 Travel photography info
Fujifilm JX370 Travel photography info
50
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (37mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
65
lighter than others in class (124g)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
low battery pack (190 per charge)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Canon A495 Landscape photography factors
Fujifilm JX370 Landscape photography factors
22
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (37mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
tiny screen (2.5")
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
MP count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual mode
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
low battery pack (190 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A495 Vlogging info
Fujifilm JX370 Vlogging info
21
wide angle not good (37mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external mic jack
28
reasonably wide (28mm)
lighter than others in class (124 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm JX370 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A495 and Fujifilm JX370
 Canon PowerShot A495Fujifilm FinePix JX370
General Information
Company Canon FujiFilm
Model type Canon PowerShot A495 Fujifilm FinePix JX370
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2010-01-05 2011-08-11
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Max enhanced ISO - 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 37-122mm (3.3x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.8 f/2.6-6.2
Macro focusing range 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 115k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology - TFT color LCD monitor
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1800s
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 175 grams (0.39 pounds) 124 grams (0.27 pounds)
Physical dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 190 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID 2 x AA NP-45A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus SD / SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Launch price $109 $159