Canon A495 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Announced August 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon A495 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Canon A495 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Canon and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the A495 (10MP) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe A495 was introduced 7 months prior to the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the A495 grades against the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon A495 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A495 & Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3. The whole galleries are provided at Canon A495 Gallery & Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| A495 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Canon A495
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | A495 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2010 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 7 months |
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
| Screen resolution | 1150k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+1035k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| A495 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Canon A495 has outside measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 has specifications of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Canon A495 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the A495 against the Fujifilm Real 3D W3.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the A495 and Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by seeing specs. The visual underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the A495 and Fujifilm Real 3D W3.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of pictures but you will need to consider the age of the cameras into account. The older A495 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A495 | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-01-05 | 2010-08-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 8cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 115k dot | 1,150k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lbs) | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | NP-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $109 | $900 |