Clicky

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm T400

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Canon PowerShot A495 front
 
Fujifilm FinePix T400 front
Portability
93
Imaging
39
Features
28
Overall
34

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm T400 Key Specs

Canon A495
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
  • Announced January 2010
Fujifilm T400
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
  • 159g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm T400 Overview

Here, we are looking at the Canon A495 and Fujifilm T400, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Canon and FujiFilm. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and Fujifilm T400 (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

The A495 was revealed 24 months earlier than the Fujifilm T400 making them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the A495 matches up vs the Fujifilm T400 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Fujifilm T400

 A495 Fujifilm T400 

Reasons to pick Fujifilm T400 over the Canon A495

 Fujifilm T400 A495 
IntroducedJanuary 2012January 2010More recent by 24 months
Display size2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k115kSharper display (+115k dot)

Common features in the Canon A495 and Fujifilm T400

 A495 Fujifilm T400 
Manual focus No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm T400 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon A495 comes with exterior measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm T400 has proportions of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).

Contrast the Canon A495 and Fujifilm T400 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the A495 compared to the Fujifilm T400.

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm T400 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the A495 and Fujifilm T400 is 93 and 93 respectively.

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm T400 top view buttons comparison

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm T400 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor measurements only by reading technical specs. The graphic below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the A495 and Fujifilm T400.

As you can tell, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Fujifilm T400 to deliver extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older A495 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm T400 sensor size comparison

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm T400 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm T400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A495 Portrait photography information
Fujifilm T400 Portrait photography information
19
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
34
good MP (16MP)
offers face detect focus
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Street Comparison

Canon A495 Street photography details
Fujifilm T400 Street photography details
46
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
57
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon A495
Sports photography with Fujifilm T400
16
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery power (180 per charge)
lacks phase detect auto focus
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon A495
Travel photography with Fujifilm T400
50
has built in flash
no Timelapse mode
low MP (10MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (37mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
65
good MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
very long zoom (280mm)
no Timelapse mode
bad battery power (180 shots)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon A495
Landscape photography with Fujifilm T400
22
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (37mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen is small (2.5 inches)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
no Timelapse mode
37
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
bad battery power (180 CIPA)
no Timelapse mode
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Canon A495
Vlogging with Fujifilm T400
21
wide angle not great (37mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
no microphone jack
31
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focus
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
no microphone socket
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm T400 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A495 and Fujifilm T400
 Canon PowerShot A495Fujifilm FinePix T400
General Information
Make Canon FujiFilm
Model Canon PowerShot A495 Fujifilm FinePix T400
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2010-01-05 2012-01-05
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3440
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Highest boosted ISO - 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 37-122mm (3.3x) 28-280mm (10.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.0-5.8 f/3.4-5.6
Macro focus range 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 115k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech - TFT color LCD monitor
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 4.50 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175 grams (0.39 lbs) 159 grams (0.35 lbs)
Physical dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 180 photographs
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model 2 x AA NP-45A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus SD / SDHC / SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $109 $150