Canon A495 vs Fujifilm XP200
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm XP200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Announced March 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon A495 vs Fujifilm XP200 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Canon A495 and Fujifilm XP200, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and FujiFilm. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe A495 was manufactured 4 years prior to the Fujifilm XP200 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the A495 matches up against the Fujifilm XP200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon A495 vs Fujifilm XP200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot A495 and Fujifilm FinePix XP200. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon A495 Gallery and Fujifilm XP200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Fujifilm XP200
| A495 | Fujifilm XP200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Canon A495
| Fujifilm XP200 | A495 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2013 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 39 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Fujifilm XP200
| A495 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm XP200 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon A495 provides external dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm XP200 has measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check the Canon A495 and Fujifilm XP200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the A495 versus the Fujifilm XP200.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the A495 and Fujifilm XP200 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm XP200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions only by researching specifications. The image underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the A495 and Fujifilm XP200.
Plainly, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Fujifilm XP200 to render greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged A495 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm XP200 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm XP200 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A495 | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-01-05 | 2013-03-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/3.9-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 115k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 pounds) | 232g (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | NP-50A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $109 | $250 |