Canon A495 vs Fujifilm Z33WP
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
96 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed July 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon A495 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Canon A495 and Fujifilm Z33WP, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the A495 (10MP) and the Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe A495 was released 7 months after the Fujifilm Z33WP so they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the A495 scores vs the Fujifilm Z33WP with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon A495 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A495 and Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon A495 Gallery and Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Fujifilm Z33WP
| A495 | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Canon A495
| Fujifilm Z33WP | A495 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Fujifilm Z33WP
| A495 | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon A495 features external measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Fujifilm Z33WP has measurements of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Compare the Canon A495 and Fujifilm Z33WP in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the A495 and the Fujifilm Z33WP.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A495 and Fujifilm Z33WP is 93 and 96 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions just by checking technical specs. The pic underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the A495 and Fujifilm Z33WP.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP so you should expect similar quality of photographs though you may want to consider the production date of the products into consideration. The more modern A495 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A495 | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-01-05 | 2009-07-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 8cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.90 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lb) | 110 gr (0.24 lb) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | NP-45 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $109 | $197 |