Canon A495 vs Fujifilm X20
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
83 Imaging
38 Features
59 Overall
46
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm X20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 353g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
- Launched April 2013
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm X10
- Successor is Fujifilm X30
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon A495 vs Fujifilm X20 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Canon A495 vs Fujifilm X20, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and FujiFilm. The resolution of the A495 (10MP) and the Fujifilm X20 (12MP) is pretty similar but the A495 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm X20 (2/3") offer different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe A495 was launched 4 years prior to the Fujifilm X20 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the A495 grades versus the Fujifilm X20 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon A495 vs Fujifilm X20 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A495 & Fujifilm X20. The complete galleries are available at Canon A495 Gallery & Fujifilm X20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Fujifilm X20
| A495 | Fujifilm X20 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X20 over the Canon A495
| Fujifilm X20 | A495 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2013 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 40 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 2.8" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Fujifilm X20
| A495 | Fujifilm X20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm X20 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Canon A495 enjoys exterior measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm X20 has specifications of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") along with a weight of 353 grams (0.78 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon A495 vs Fujifilm X20 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the A495 versus the Fujifilm X20.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the A495 and Fujifilm X20 is 93 and 83 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm X20 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements just by reading specifications. The graphic here should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the A495 and Fujifilm X20.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The A495 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh trickier and the Fujifilm X20 will deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The older A495 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm X20 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm X20 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Fujifilm X20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A495 | Fujifilm X20 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-05 | 2013-04-29 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | EXR Processor II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS X-TRANS II |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 2/3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.8 x 6.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 58.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/2.0-2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.8 inches |
| Resolution of display | 115k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (tunnel) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 85 percent |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 7.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/1000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lb) | 353 gr (0.78 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 270 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | NP-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $109 | $500 |