Canon A495 vs Kodak C140
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
Canon A495 vs Kodak C140 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon A495 vs Kodak C140 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Canon A495 versus Kodak C140, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Canon and Kodak. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and C140 (8MP) and the A495 (1/2.3") and C140 (1/2.5") feature totally different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe A495 was launched 13 months later than the C140 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a full comparison, below is a concise summary of how the A495 grades vs the C140 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon A495 vs Kodak C140 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot A495 & Kodak EasyShare C140. The complete galleries are available at Canon A495 Gallery & Kodak C140 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Kodak C140
| A495 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Canon A495
| C140 | A495 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Kodak C140
| A495 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Canon A495 vs Kodak C140 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon A495 has exterior measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Kodak C140 has proportions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Canon A495 versus Kodak C140 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the A495 vs the C140.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A495 and C140 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Kodak C140 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by seeing technical specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the A495 and C140.
As you can tell, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The A495 due to its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Canon A495 will produce extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The newer A495 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Canon A495 vs Kodak C140 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon A495 vs Kodak C140 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Kodak EasyShare C140 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Kodak |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A495 | Kodak EasyShare C140 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-05 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 8MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/2.7-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 13cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 grams (0.39 lb) | 160 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $109 | $80 |