Clicky

Canon A495 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Canon PowerShot A495 front
 
Kodak Easyshare M5370 front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
35
Overall
37

Canon A495 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Key Specs

Canon A495
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
  • Announced January 2010
Kodak Easyshare M5370
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Released September 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon A495 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Canon A495 versus Kodak Easyshare M5370, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Canon and Kodak. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and Easyshare M5370 (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The A495 was manufactured 20 months before the Easyshare M5370 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a short view of how the A495 scores against the Easyshare M5370 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370

 A495 Easyshare M5370 

Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Canon A495

 Easyshare M5370 A495 
ReleasedSeptember 2011January 2010Newer by 20 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution230k115kSharper display (+115k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Canon A495 and Kodak Easyshare M5370

 A495 Easyshare M5370 
Manual focus No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Canon A495 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon A495 has exterior dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Kodak Easyshare M5370 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).

Analyze the Canon A495 versus Kodak Easyshare M5370 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the A495 and the Easyshare M5370.

Canon A495 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the A495 and Easyshare M5370 is 93 and 95 respectively.

Canon A495 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 top view buttons comparison

Canon A495 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through specs. The image underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the A495 and Easyshare M5370.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to provide you with extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged A495 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Canon A495 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 sensor size comparison

Canon A495 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A495 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon A495
Portrait photography with Kodak Easyshare M5370
19
no manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
34
decent MP (16MP)
supports face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon A495
Street photography with Kodak Easyshare M5370
46
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
48
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Canon A495 as a Sports photography camera
Kodak Easyshare M5370 as a Sports photography camera
16
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
29
decent MP (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Canon A495 Travel photography factors
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Travel photography factors
50
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse mode
MP count low (10 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (37mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
72
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
missing Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Canon A495 as a Landscape photography camera
Kodak Easyshare M5370 as a Landscape photography camera
22
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (37mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is small (2.5")
no manual mode
no image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
does not have Time Lapse mode
43
pretty wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
decent sized screen (3")
decent MP (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A495 Vlogging features
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Vlogging features
21
wide angle not good (37mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external mic support
32
pretty wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
touchscreen capability
supports face detection focusing
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Canon A495 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A495 and Kodak Easyshare M5370
 Canon PowerShot A495Kodak Easyshare M5370
General Information
Make Canon Kodak
Model Canon PowerShot A495 Kodak Easyshare M5370
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2010-01-05 2011-09-14
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 80 64
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 37-122mm (3.3x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0-5.8 -
Macro focus distance 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 115 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m 3.20 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-1, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175g (0.39 lb) 150g (0.33 lb)
Dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch price $109 $160