Canon A495 vs Nikon S810c
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
![Canon PowerShot A495 front Canon PowerShot A495 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-PowerShot-A495/Canon-A495-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix S810c front Nikon Coolpix S810c front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S810c/Nikon-S810c-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Canon A495 vs Nikon S810c Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 216g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced April 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Canon A495 vs Nikon S810c Overview
Let's look more closely at the Canon A495 vs Nikon S810c, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Canon and Nikon. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and S810c (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The A495 was announced 5 years before the S810c which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the A495 grades against the S810c with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Canon A495 vs Nikon S810c Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A495 & Nikon Coolpix S810c. The whole galleries are available at Canon A495 Gallery & Nikon S810c Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Nikon S810c
A495 | S810c |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S810c over the Canon A495
S810c | A495 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2014 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 51 months |
Display size | 3.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 115k | Sharper display (+1114k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Nikon S810c
A495 | S810c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Canon A495 vs Nikon S810c Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Canon A495 has got exterior dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Nikon S810c has specifications of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Canon A495 vs Nikon S810c in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the A495 vs the S810c.
![Canon A495 vs Nikon S810c size comparison Canon A495 vs Nikon S810c size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A495-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S810c-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A495 and S810c is 93 and 91 respectively.
![Canon A495 vs Nikon S810c top view buttons comparison Canon A495 vs Nikon S810c top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A495-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S810c-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon A495 vs Nikon S810c Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by checking specifications. The pic underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A495 and S810c.
To sum up, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can anticipate the Nikon S810c to resolve greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images way more aggressively. The more aged A495 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
![Canon A495 vs Nikon S810c sensor size comparison Canon A495 vs Nikon S810c sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A495-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S810c-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon A495 vs Nikon S810c Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon A495 vs Nikon S810c Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A495 vs Nikon S810c Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A495-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S810c-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Canon A495 vs Nikon S810c Specifications
Canon PowerShot A495 | Nikon Coolpix S810c | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Nikon |
Model | Canon PowerShot A495 | Nikon Coolpix S810c |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-01-05 | 2014-04-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/3.3-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 2cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 175 grams (0.39 lb) | 216 grams (0.48 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 270 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 2 x AA | EN-EL23 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | microSD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $109 | $350 |