Clicky

Canon A495 vs Olympus 7040

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Canon PowerShot A495 front
 
Olympus Stylus 7040 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
31
Overall
34

Canon A495 vs Olympus 7040 Key Specs

Canon A495
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
  • Launched January 2010
Olympus 7040
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 144g - 95 x 56 x 26mm
  • Launched January 2010
  • Other Name is mju 7040
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon A495 vs Olympus 7040 Overview

In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Canon A495 versus Olympus 7040, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Canon and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and 7040 (14MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The A495 was announced very close to the 7040 which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the A495 grades vs the 7040 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Olympus 7040

 A495 7040 

Reasons to pick Olympus 7040 over the Canon A495

 7040 A495 
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution230k115kCrisper screen (+115k dot)

Common features in the Canon A495 and Olympus 7040

 A495 7040 
LaunchedJanuary 2010January 2010Similar age
Manual focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Canon A495 vs Olympus 7040 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Canon A495 has physical measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus 7040 has sizing of 95mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs).

Examine the Canon A495 versus Olympus 7040 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the A495 against the 7040.

Canon A495 vs Olympus 7040 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A495 and 7040 is 93 and 95 respectively.

Canon A495 vs Olympus 7040 top view buttons comparison

Canon A495 vs Olympus 7040 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions simply by checking technical specs. The picture underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the A495 and 7040.

As you can tell, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can count on the Olympus 7040 to resolve extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a little more aggressively.

Canon A495 vs Olympus 7040 sensor size comparison

Canon A495 vs Olympus 7040 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A495 vs Olympus 7040 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon A495
Portrait photography with Olympus 7040
19
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
28
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Canon A495 as a Street photography camera
Olympus 7040 as a Street photography camera
46
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
57
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Canon A495 Sports photography advice
Olympus 7040 Sports photography advice
16
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
39
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
slow fps (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Canon A495 Travel photography factors
Olympus 7040 Travel photography factors
50
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (37mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
65
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Canon A495 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus 7040 as a Landscape photography camera
22
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (37mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
42
really wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
no Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A495 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus 7040 as a Vlogging camera
21
wide angle not good (37mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have mic support
29
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon A495 vs Olympus 7040 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A495 and Olympus 7040
 Canon PowerShot A495Olympus Stylus 7040
General Information
Make Canon Olympus
Model type Canon PowerShot A495 Olympus Stylus 7040
Otherwise known as - mju 7040
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-01-05 2010-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 80 64
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 37-122mm (3.3x) 28-196mm (7.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.0-5.8 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm 2cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 115k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 5.70 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 175 grams (0.39 pounds) 144 grams (0.32 pounds)
Dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 95 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 2 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus SC/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $109 $299