Canon A495 vs Olympus 8000
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbde0/bbde0b2c449374bbe735730425e6fe0e1983d8cd" alt="Canon PowerShot A495 front Canon PowerShot A495 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e541/6e541f13ef88ea0ca8eaf6180c7a6a686d0521cf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Canon A495 vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 8000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon A495 vs Olympus 8000 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Canon A495 versus Olympus 8000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the A495 (10MP) and the 8000 (12MP) is fairly close and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The A495 was brought out 7 months later than the 8000 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the A495 scores vs the 8000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon A495 vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A495 and Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The entire galleries are available at Canon A495 Gallery and Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Olympus 8000
A495 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2010 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Canon A495
8000 | A495 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 115k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Olympus 8000
A495 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Canon A495 vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon A495 offers physical dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus 8000 has proportions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
Check out the Canon A495 versus Olympus 8000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the A495 versus the 8000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fec8b/fec8b2abec51b9cfc44cff73477f40e289e47b93" alt="Canon A495 vs Olympus 8000 size comparison Canon A495 vs Olympus 8000 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the A495 and 8000 is 93 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fff5/6fff504dfc79ead4f16151c2a73c7962ca204865" alt="Canon A495 vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison Canon A495 vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison"
Canon A495 vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements just by looking through specifications. The photograph here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the A495 and 8000.
To sum up, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Olympus 8000 to render greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger A495 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73691/73691cda002af045df54015afa03de2b21c82d10" alt="Canon A495 vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison Canon A495 vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison"
Canon A495 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90581/90581963de55488c5fa018456f48a49df52f3203" alt="Canon A495 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A495 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon A495 vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A495 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot A495 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
Also called as | - | mju Tough 8000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-01-05 | 2009-07-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 115 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 1/4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 175 grams (0.39 pounds) | 182 grams (0.40 pounds) |
Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $109 | $380 |