Canon A495 vs Olympus VG-160
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Canon A495 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon A495 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Below is a in-depth review of the Canon A495 versus Olympus VG-160, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Canon and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and VG-160 (14MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe A495 was released 24 months before the VG-160 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the A495 scores vs the VG-160 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon A495 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot A495 & Olympus VG-160. The complete galleries are available at Canon A495 Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Olympus VG-160
| A495 | VG-160 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Canon A495
| VG-160 | A495 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 | January 2010 | More recent by 24 months | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 115k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Olympus VG-160
| A495 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Canon A495 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon A495 provides outer measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon A495 versus Olympus VG-160 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the A495 against the VG-160.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A495 and VG-160 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements simply by looking through a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the A495 and VG-160.
As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus VG-160 to render greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older A495 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Canon A495 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon A495 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A495 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-01-05 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 lbs) | 125g (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 165 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $109 | $90 |