Clicky

Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Canon PowerShot A495 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Canon A495
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
  • Launched January 2010
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced July 2011
  • Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Below is a extended review of the Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The A495 was revealed 18 months prior to the VR-320 making them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief summation of how the A495 matches up vs the VR-320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Olympus VR-320

 A495 VR-320 

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Canon A495

 VR-320 A495 
IntroducedJuly 2011January 2010More recent by 18 months
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution230k115kCrisper display (+115k dot)

Common features in the Canon A495 and Olympus VR-320

 A495 VR-320 
Focus manually Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

If you're going to lug around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and size. The Canon A495 enjoys outside measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

See the Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the A495 compared to the VR-320.

Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A495 and VR-320 is 93 and 94 respectively.

Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements just by looking through specs. The graphic below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the A495 and VR-320.

All in all, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Olympus VR-320 to render greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older A495 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A495 Portrait photography details
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography details
19
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
33
good MP (14 megapixels)
comes with face detect focus
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Canon A495 Street photography info
Olympus VR-320 Street photography info
46
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (158 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Canon A495 Sports photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography highlights
16
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
47
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon A495
Travel photography with Olympus VR-320
50
flash built-in
no Time Lapse mode
resolution not great (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
70
lighter than competition (158 grams)
good MP (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Canon A495 Landscape photography information
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography information
22
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
42
decently wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A495 Vlogging info
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging info
21
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
no external mic jack
32
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focus
lighter than competition (158g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A495 and Olympus VR-320
 Canon PowerShot A495Olympus VR-320
General Information
Company Canon Olympus
Model Canon PowerShot A495 Olympus VR-320
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2010-01-05 2011-07-19
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 37-122mm (3.3x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximal aperture f/3.0-5.8 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 115k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175 gr (0.39 lbs) 158 gr (0.35 lbs)
Physical dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus SD/SDHC
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $109 $179