Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Below is a extended review of the Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe A495 was revealed 18 months prior to the VR-320 making them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief summation of how the A495 matches up vs the VR-320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A495 and Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are available at Canon A495 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Olympus VR-320
| A495 | VR-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Canon A495
| VR-320 | A495 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 | January 2010 | More recent by 18 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Olympus VR-320
| A495 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and size. The Canon A495 enjoys outside measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the A495 compared to the VR-320.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A495 and VR-320 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements just by looking through specs. The graphic below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the A495 and VR-320.
All in all, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Olympus VR-320 to render greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older A495 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A495 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-01-05 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 115k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $109 | $179 |