Clicky

Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-340

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Canon PowerShot A495 front
 
Olympus VR-340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
38
Features
36
Overall
37

Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs

Canon A495
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview

On this page, we are looking at the Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Canon and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and VR-340 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The A495 was manufactured 24 months earlier than the VR-340 making them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the A495 matches up vs the VR-340 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Olympus VR-340

 A495 VR-340 

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Canon A495

 VR-340 A495 
LaunchedJanuary 2012January 2010Newer by 24 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k115kSharper display (+345k dot)

Common features in the Canon A495 and Olympus VR-340

 A495 VR-340 
Manually focus No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison

If you are going to travel with your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon A495 comes with outside measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus VR-340 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Examine the Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-340 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the A495 against the VR-340.

Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A495 and VR-340 is 93 and 96 respectively.

Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison

Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by seeing a spec sheet. The picture here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the A495 and VR-340.

As you can see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus VR-340 to show extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged A495 will be behind in sensor technology.

Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison

Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A495 Portrait photography factors
Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography factors
19
manual focus not available
no manual mode
external flash not possible
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
34
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has face detection focus
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Canon A495 Street photography advice
Olympus VR-340 Street photography advice
46
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
63
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (125g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon A495
Sports photography with Olympus VR-340
16
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
44
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon A495
Travel photography with Olympus VR-340
50
flash built-in
no Time Lapse mode
MP count low (10 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (37mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
68
lighter than average (125g)
megapixel count good (16MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
no Timelapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Canon A495 Landscape photography info
Olympus VR-340 Landscape photography info
22
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (37mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen is small (2.5 inch)
no manual mode
no image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
42
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
manual focus not available
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
no Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A495 Vlogging information
Olympus VR-340 Vlogging information
21
wide angle not the best (37mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
no mic support
33
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
lighter than average (125 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone port
Photography Glossary

Canon A495 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A495 and Olympus VR-340
 Canon PowerShot A495Olympus VR-340
General Information
Brand Name Canon Olympus
Model Canon PowerShot A495 Olympus VR-340
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-01-05 2012-01-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 37-122mm (3.3x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.8 f/3.0-5.7
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 115 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 1.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m 4.80 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175 grams (0.39 lb) 125 grams (0.28 lb)
Physical dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $109 $130